-
Website
http://www.dshan.me/blog -
Original page
http://dshan.me/blog/2009/11/the-blogger-is-not-real.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
doniree
38 comments · 5 points
-
freeandflawed
6 comments · 3 points
-
lfar
9 comments · 1 points
-
johnonline
5 comments · 1 points
-
foiledcupcakes
10 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Ten Years Ago And Tomorrow
1 week ago · 40 comments
-
http://dshan.me/blog/2009/12/1416.html
2 weeks ago · 15 comments
-
Investigate Your Value
4 weeks ago · 25 comments
-
Ten Years Ago And Tomorrow
So well said. But we've also written the words we write for a reason; we've constructed ourselves and dictated the way people see us through the lens of the Internet. We control our emotions, calculate our thoughts to cater to an invisible audience. Or we let it all go, relying on the anonymity to provide us with a safe release valve.
We aren't who our blogs say we are -- we're so much more.
undermine the level of honesty those words may represent. The most genuine
writers are still a lot more than what they might produce on paper or
online. Far more complex...and different in really simple ways too.
we're ourselves. The blogger is a part (big or small) of us. Not the
whole.
In person, at parties for example, you might present a socially constructed self that is calculated--fake. But even when being authentic and open during a long conversation with a close friend, the sharing of your thoughts and ideas never reveals the entirety of who you are.
I find that writing enables me to dig more deeply into who I am and what I think. The blog just makes it easier to share that deeper part of me with everyone else. It is tempting to be false and try to present a "prettier" version of who I really am, but I constantly remind myself that being genuine and honest is more important to me. So, I choose to show my warts and all.
in person and online. Writing is a great way to 'record' yourself, as
accurately as you can.
Thanks for stopping by:)
are. Maybe I'm wrong, because I don't know you the way I know my best
friends, but I'd imagine that someone on the other side of the world who
took in all your content would still have quite an adjustment period when it
came to really getting to know you.
It's just not possible to BE the person your output makes you out to be.
This says nothing of the influence that each audience member's biases and
influences bring to the interaction.
Thanks for a great post!
project ourselves and find some truth or effect or impact. It's just a
piece of the whole picture.
Imagine dating someone purely online.
I'm much more introverted/a homebody than my blog would make it seem. And my sex life is not nearly as exciting.
(And thanks for the compliment:))
We are all characters here.
Exactly. It's too easy to take the person as their blog represents them, but people are much more than that, no matter how much you think you relate or understand them.
blog, struck me because Raymi is probably one of the most prolific online
diarists there is...multiple posts daily, hundreds of pictures and
self-portraits a week. It's been her thing for years...total immersion.
It's made her an online celebrity.
Yet, she just went through a terrible breakup, and she (and her more
insightful readers) found herself looking at the gap between the person her
audience might see and the person she saw and felt in private.
Here's the internet's best example of putting it ALL out there, and she's
telling her audience "listen, I am not exactly, to every detail, who and
what you make me out to be".
With that said, I think my blog represents who I am pretty well, with the exception that I don't verbalize my feelings "in real life" anywhere nearly as much as I'm able to do in my writing.
WELL PUT.
And I do think some writers (yourself included) do a great job of
self-representation. Those writers have a voice, generally, and fall into
that third category here and there when they realize that doing a decent job
of engaging other people by writing start to become a bigger thing than just
recounting your life accurately.
I will admit, my blog is WAY toned down from what I am. I generally try and stay uh...'family-friendly'/I won't be embarrassed if the head of my 'traditional' engineering company reads this.
Twitter and facebook however...for some reason I feel like those are more of a free for all...anybody else feel this way? I have no idea where I got that idea.
I also think that the longer I blog, the more it's become about conveying ideas or feelings in a way that creates feedback, conversations, or relationships. Somehow that's actually made this LESS toned down than I think it was early on. It's almost like; now that I'm out there I might as well try to be myself as best I can.
I'm not sure how the noveling part of it will turn out, but it's a topic that's been on my mind for awhile.
(*highly unlikely)
But that is all it is, the extension. It's not all of me, but it is a part of me. So for a reader that may possibly meet me or maybe has met me have come to realize that for a blogger with many words, I'm rather quiet in person and my personality is completely lacking in my blog. But at the same time, they know that part of me that I write about, my interests, my activities, etc. Pieces of my life. An extension. Like an extra limb.
I kind of thought people would hate this post, for instance. Not that it's loved, but no one has said it was unfounded and totally confusing, which is something I thought might get said.
Interesting things to chew on, D. Thanks for sparking the conversation.
But, I suppose, there are artful ways of establishing mystery.
So I say this because I wonder: who am I in public? And who am I in private?
Thought-provoking post, for sure. Totally a keeper, and I'm Delicious'ing this.
i tend to be more forthcoming on twitter, because it's blocked and i have very few "in real life" people on there -- and the ones i do, i know love all the horrible things about me. i put very little about me on facebook -- mostly because i have a TON of work people on there.
but what you say is very intriging and i can completely understand where you are coming from and i believe that a lot of bloggers probably pain themselves in a different light whether it is intentional or not.
Anyone that hasn't met me face to face could read every single post I ever published, but they wouldn't really know me until they could see my face light up when I recognize them in a crowd, or the tremble in my hand as I pick up my glass. They haven't seen me, taken in my scent and posture, my tone and inflection. You can have an intimate understanding of someone's thoughts, feelings, experiences and personality from reading their blog posts. That doesn't mean you *know* them. So much of the information we take in about someone is subconscious, and we don't have the data for that level of knowing without being able to hear them laugh, or feel their knee under our palm while we're emphasizing a point.
The most authentic bloggers might give you all the parts, but the whole is greater than the sum of the parts, and it is that "gap" or difference that we gain from meeting in person.
ps: i love being late to the party. ;)
them for years. It fills in some personality gaps and adds dimension to a
two-dimensional interaction.
Looking forward to meeting you!
And of course, about a topic with which we all deal. I twittered last week about it, in fact - I think I wrote something like "Please don't fall in love with the online version; the real thing just isn't as cool."
So anyway - point is, thanks for writing it in a way that doesn't depress, but instead inspires...
online personas a little cooler than we really are, right?
It should be akin to Fight Club 'You are not your fucking khakis' You are NOT your blog. You are you.